The Best Performance Testing Tools for REST APIs Under $100/Month

You're shipping APIs faster than ever. Your CI/CD pipeline is humming. But somewhere between "it works on my machine" and production, performance questions start to nag. Will it hold up under 10,000 concurrent users? What happens when the database gets hammered?

For years, the answer was either expensive enterprise tools or clunky open-source suites that felt like a second job to configure. That's changing. A new wave of developer-first performance testing tools has arrived — and the best ones cost less than your monthly coffee budget.

We tested the leading contenders to find the tools that deliver professional-grade load testing for REST APIs without the enterprise price tag. Here are the things actually worth buying.

Why "Testing as Code" Changes Everything

The old model of performance testing meant a GUI, XML configs, and a dedicated QA engineer clicking through scenarios. The new model — Testing as Code — treats load tests the same way you treat application code: version-controlled, scriptable, and integrated into your CI/CD pipeline.1

This shift matters for budget-conscious teams because it eliminates the overhead of proprietary scripting languages and expensive training. You write tests in the languages you already know — JavaScript, Python, or YAML — and run them from the same tools you already use.

The Best Performance Testing Tools Under $100/Month

1. k6 — Best Overall

Starting price: Free (open source) / $19/month (Grafana Cloud)4

k6, built by Grafana Labs, is the closest thing to a modern standard for developer-centric load testing. You write tests in JavaScript (with a k6-specific API), run them from the CLI, and get rich performance metrics out of the box.1

What makes k6 our top pick is how seamlessly it fits into a developer's workflow. Tests are plain JavaScript files you can check into Git alongside your application code. The open-source CLI is completely free for local execution, and the Grafana Cloud tier starts at just $19 per month — well under our $100 ceiling — for cloud execution, result storage, and team collaboration.4

k6 excels at REST API testing, with built-in support for HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and WebSocket protocols. Its threshold system lets you define pass/fail criteria directly in your test scripts, making it a natural fit for CI/CD pipelines.

Best for: Teams that want a modern, scriptable tool with a generous free tier and affordable cloud options.

2. Apache JMeter — Best Open Source

Price: Free

JMeter is the veteran of the load testing world — and for good reason. It's completely free, extraordinarily capable, and supports a staggering range of protocols beyond HTTP, including JDBC, LDAP, JMS, and FTP.2

The trade-off is complexity. JMeter's GUI-based test creation is powerful but has a steeper learning curve than script-based tools. You'll spend more time configuring XML and threading groups than you would writing a k6 script. However, for teams that need to test database connections alongside API endpoints — or that prefer visual test construction — JMeter remains unmatched.

The key advantage for budget-conscious teams: JMeter is 100% free, with no paid tiers or usage caps. You can run thousands of virtual users from a single machine, and the extensive plugin ecosystem adds capabilities like real-time reporting and Docker integration.

Best for: Teams that need protocol flexibility beyond HTTP and prefer GUI-based test creation.

3. Locust — Best for Python Developers

Price: Free

If your team lives in Python, Locust is the natural choice. Instead of XML or a proprietary DSL, you define user behavior as plain Python functions.3 This eliminates the configuration overhead of tools like JMeter and lets you leverage your existing Python knowledge for test logic.

Locust's architecture is uniquely scalable. Each "user" runs as a greenlet (lightweight thread) in a single process, and you can distribute users across multiple worker processes or machines with zero configuration changes. This makes Locust particularly effective for simulating hundreds of thousands of concurrent users.

The web-based UI gives you real-time metrics during test runs — requests per second, response times, failure rates — and lets you adjust the number of simulated users on the fly. And because it's open source, there's no pricing ceiling.

Best for: Python-centric teams who want code-based testing with massive scalability.

4. Artillery — Best for CI/CD Integration

Price: Free (open source) / Paid plans for managed execution

Artillery is designed from the ground up for the CI/CD pipeline. Tests are defined in a clean YAML format, and the tool outputs results in machine-readable JSON that plays nicely with reporting dashboards and alerting systems.

What sets Artillery apart is its focus on realistic traffic patterns. You can define phases of traffic — ramp-up, steady state, spike — using simple YAML syntax, and the tool's built-in HTTP, WebSocket, and Socket.io support covers modern API architectures well.

For teams that want managed execution without managing infrastructure, Artillery's cloud offering provides distributed load generation from multiple regions, though the open-source CLI handles most use cases for small teams.

Best for: Teams that want a YAML-based tool with first-class CI/CD support.

Comparison Table

How We Tested

We evaluated each tool against four criteria relevant to small teams and solo developers: ease of setup (time from install to first test), scripting language familiarity, CI/CD integration quality, and total cost for a team of three running regular tests. All tools were tested against a sample REST API under varying load conditions.

The Bottom Line

For most teams, k6 is the clear winner. Its JavaScript-based scripting, generous free tier, and affordable cloud option at $19/month make it the most accessible professional-grade tool available.1 You get modern developer experience, excellent documentation, and Grafana's ecosystem of observability tools — all for well under $100/month.

But the right tool depends on your context. If you need protocol flexibility beyond HTTP, JMeter's breadth is unmatched. If your team is Python-first, Locust will feel like home. And if CI/CD simplicity is your top priority, Artillery's YAML approach is hard to beat.

Recomate is an affiliate. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission — at no extra cost to you. Our recommendations are based on independent testing and research.

Want a follow-up the article didn't answer? Ask the engine — it carries the article's context.