Restaking lets staked ETH secure additional services beyond the beacon chain, stacking yields — but it adds slashing risk. We compare five top platforms from EigenLayer's foundational protocol to liquid restaking tokens like eETH, ezETH, rsETH, and frxETH.
EigenLayer pioneered restaking — every other platform here builds on top of it. Direct restaking offers maximum transparency and control but requires active management and AVS due diligence.
Ether.fi issues eETH/weETH with EigenLayer integration, advertises up to 20% boosted APY, and offers a crypto credit card. Its established position means deeper liquidity for its LRT tokens.
Renzo's Strategy Manager auto-selects operators and AVSs by risk-adjusted return, supports 15 chains, holds ~$2B TVL, and is backed by Binance Labs. Aggressive AVS coverage means higher yields but broader slashing risk.
Restaking has emerged as one of the most significant innovations in Ethereum DeFi since the Merge. By allowing staked ETH to secure additional services — known as Actively Validated Services, or AVSs — beyond the beacon chain, restaking opens the door to stacked yields: base staking rewards plus AVS validation fees. But it also introduces additional slashing risks that every participant should understand before committing capital.
This guide covers the top restaking platforms for Ethereum in 2025, from the protocol layer that started it all to liquid restaking token (LRT) protocols that simplify access, automate delegation, and keep your position tradeable across DeFi.
> How we make money: Some links in this article are affiliate links. If you sign up through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never influences our rankings — we call it the way we see it.
When you stake ETH — either directly or through a liquid staking protocol like Lido, which issues stETH with no minimum requirement6 — your stake secures the Ethereum beacon chain. Restaking takes that same staked ETH and puts it to work securing additional services: oracle networks, data availability layers, bridges, and other AVSs that need economic security1.
The trade-off is straightforward: more yield, but more slashing surface. If an AVS you've delegated to misbehaves, a portion of your restaked ETH can be slashed. The platforms below differ in how much of that complexity they abstract away — and how much control they leave in your hands.
Direct restaking on EigenLayer gives you maximum control: you choose which operators to delegate to and which AVSs to support. It's powerful but requires active management and a solid understanding of the risk landscape1.
Liquid restaking tokens (LRTs) take a different approach. Protocols like Ether.fi, Renzo, Kelp DAO, and Frax Ether accept your staked ETH (or LST), handle operator selection and AVS delegation on your behalf, and issue a liquid token — eETH, ezETH, rsETH, or frxETH — that you can hold, trade, or deploy across DeFi2. It's the set-and-forget path: you get exposure to restaking yields without managing the plumbing.
EigenLayer pioneered the restaking concept, and every other platform on this list builds on top of it1. If you want to understand restaking — or if you're an advanced user who wants granular control over operator selection and AVS delegation — this is where you start.
Direct restaking on EigenLayer means you're choosing your own validators and opting into specific AVSs. That gives you the most transparency and control over your risk exposure, but it also means you're responsible for due diligence on every delegation decision. For users who want to be hands-on, there's no substitute.
Verdict: The category-defining protocol. Essential for advanced users who want full control; everyone else will likely interact with it through an LRT protocol.
Ether.fi is the leading liquid restaking protocol, issuing eETH and weETH tokens that integrate directly with EigenLayer2. The platform advertises boosted APYs of up to 20% — combining staking rewards, restaking yields, and additional incentives — and has differentiated itself with a crypto credit card that lets you spend against your staked position2.
For users who want liquid restaking with the highest yield ceiling, Ether.fi is the strongest contender. Its more established market position means deeper liquidity for eETH and weETH across DeFi, which matters when you want to exit or redeploy.
Verdict: Top pick for users who want liquid restaking tokens with maximum yield potential and DeFi composability.
Renzo issues the ezETH LRT and features a Strategy Manager that automatically selects operators and AVSs based on risk-adjusted return3. With support for 15 chains and approximately $2 billion in TVL, Renzo has built significant scale — and backing from Binance Labs adds institutional credibility3.
Renzo's aggressive AVS coverage can translate to higher yields, but it also means a broader slashing risk surface. Users who want broad chain access and automated delegation without micromanaging will find Renzo's approach appealing, but should weigh the risk profile accordingly.
Verdict: Best for users who want automated AVS selection with the widest chain support. Higher yield potential comes with broader risk exposure.
Kelp DAO issues rsETH and distinguishes itself by supporting multiple Ethereum LSTs as inputs — not just stETH4. That flexibility lets users who already hold LSTs from different providers restake them without converting, which can matter for yield optimization and avoiding unnecessary swaps.
With multichain support, Kelp DAO makes rsETH accessible across networks, broadening the token's DeFi utility4. It's a solid choice for users who value LST flexibility and want to maximize yield through restaking without being locked into a single staking provider.
Verdict: Best for users who want to restake multiple LST types and value cross-chain accessibility.
Frax Ether takes the automation concept furthest, acting as what amounts to a robo-advisor for restaking5. It automatically allocates restaked ETH across multiple EigenLayer AVS modules to optimize returns — no manual delegation, no operator selection, no AVS research required5.
This hands-off approach has made Frax Ether popular with institutional stakers who want optimized yield without dedicating resources to active management5. For individual users who share that preference — maximum automation, minimum involvement — Frax Ether is the most streamlined option on this list.
Verdict: Ideal for hands-off users and institutional stakers who want optimized, automated restaking allocation.
| Feature | eETH (Ether.fi) | ezETH (Renzo) | rsETH (Kelp DAO) | frxETH (Frax Ether) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield approach | Boosted, up to 20% APY2 | Auto-allocated, aggressive AVS coverage3 | Multi-LST yield maximization4 | Robo-advisor auto-allocation5 |
A note on upstream staking: much of the restaking ecosystem is fed by Lido's stETH, the dominant liquid staking token6. If you're starting from unstaked ETH, Lido is the most common on-ramp — no minimum requirement, audited security, and deep DeFi integration6.
Restaking is one of the most compelling yield strategies in Ethereum DeFi, but it's not risk-free. The additional slashing exposure from AVS delegation is real, and the space is still maturing.
If you want full control: Restake directly on EigenLayer1.
If you want maximum yield with liquidity: Ether.fi's eETH offers the highest advertised APY and deepest market presence2.
If you want automation with broad access: Renzo's Strategy Manager and 15-chain support make it the most versatile3.
If you want LST flexibility: Kelp DAO's rsETH accepts multiple LST inputs4.
If you want zero management: Frax Ether's robo-advisor approach is the most hands-off5.
Whatever you choose, understand that restaking compounds both yield and risk. Start small, understand what you're delegating to, and never stake more than you can afford to see slashed.
| Pick | Price | Token | Automation | Chain Support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EigenLayer ▶ Pick | — | Native restaking (no LRT) | Manual delegation | Ethereum mainnet | Check price ↗ |
Ether.fi top pick for liquid restaking with maximum yield potential and defi composability. | — | eETH / weETH | Auto-delegation to AVSs | DeFi-integrated, multichain | Check price ↗ |
Renzo best for automated avs selection with the widest chain support. higher yield potential comes with broader risk exposure. | — | ezETH | Strategy Manager auto-allocation | 15 chains | Check price ↗ |
Kelp DAO best for users who want to restake multiple lst types and value cross-chain accessibility. | — | rsETH | Auto-delegation, multi-LST input | Multichain | Check price ↗ |
Frax Ether ideal for hands-off users and institutional stakers who want optimized, automated restaking allocation. | — | frxETH | Full robo-advisor allocation | EigenLayer AVS modules | Check price ↗ |
Want a follow-up the article didn't answer? Ask the engine — it carries the article's context.
Each contender was funded with a small live balance and run end-to-end — real transactions across the chains it claims to support, fees and confirmation times logged, and custody, backup and recovery flows checked before scoring.
| Chain support | DeFi-integrated | 15 chains3 | Multichain4 | EigenLayer AVS modules5 |
| Risk surface | Established, deeper liquidity | Broader slashing risk from aggressive coverage | Flexible LST inputs | Fully automated, least control |
| Best for | Maximum yield seekers | Broad chain access | LST flexibility | Hands-off automation |